600 W 26th St, Austin TX 78705 · aliases: Twenty-Six West, 26 West Apartments
Verified · 3 sources Data vintage 2026-09-14
Code complaints the City of Austin has logged for this address. We match them to the county parcel ID (0215020501), the county's record for this plot of land. The number counts filings; a rating is separate.
Last 36 mo: 4 distinct · 1 duplicate · 1 open
Source: Austin 6wtj-zbtb · captured 2026-09-14
Manual, sampled capture, no scraper.
WCII analysis Pricing is JavaScript-rendered or call-for-pricing, so the weekly static-HTML archive finds no dollar figures.
Published only when the scoring rule is public. Same rule, same day, every building. Read the rule →
The lived record
Not yet captured. Review acquisition is manual and sampled.
The lived-experience-only rating (raw Google rating recomputed against tour/staff-praise and pre-opening reviews) is a planned layer. Review acquisition is manual and sampled, and no scraper is built by default (guardrail 5). Nothing is shown here until real data is collected.
5 cases on the city's file · 4 distinct in the last 36 months.
Source: Austin 6wtj-zbtb · captured 2026-09-14 · parcel 0215020501
Austin files each complaint under a category and records how it ended, the outcome. “No violation found,” “closed via voluntary compliance” (a problem the city got fixed), and “duplicate case” are different stories, and the outcome sits under each status. Where a complaint became a formal violation case, that row links to the city's full case file.
Minimal adverse record
4 code complaints were filed with the city on this parcel in the last 36 months. The city closed 1 of them as duplicates, and a duplicate counts as half a filing, which gives 3.5. That number sets the label above, under a rule that applies to every building the same way. Each case is listed below and links to the city's own record.
WCII analysis, not a finding of wrongdoing. The count is not adjusted for the number of beds yet, so a large tower and a small building sit on the same scale. How this label is decided.
5 filed · 1 duplicate · 3 no violation found · 1 still open
Austin's own disposition labels, counted. This is not a WCII judgement and not a finding of wrongdoing. Records outside the 36-month window are in the ledger below but not in these counts.
| Opened | Case ID | Type | Status & outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| September 1, 2026 | 2026-114555 CC City case file2026 115910-CV | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Active Investigation in Progress |
| August 22, 2026 | 2026-110101 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed August 25, 2026 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| August 12, 2025 | 2025-102170 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed August 15, 2025 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| January 27, 2025 | 2025-009628 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed January 27, 2025 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| December 9, 2023 | 2023-157585 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed December 15, 2023 Closed/Duplicate Case |
These are Austin's own records. To read a specific one, search its case ID in the City's public code-complaint table →
Before you sign
Owner of record, the legal entity behind it, and the operator, American Campus Communities.
Source: TCAD 2026 preliminary roll · TX Comptroller · captured per receipts
The name on the marketing isn't always the name on the deed. Here is the chain as public records file it: the owner of record, the legal entity behind it, and the operator who runs the building. That is who you'd actually be renting from.
3 primary sources. Every fact on this page traces to one of them.
Every fact on this page traces to a primary source below. This is the "back every claim with a receipt" rule made literal. The building would not appear on the site without it.
Every verified building and operator on this site is checked against the same public datasets, by the same rule, on the same schedule.
Corrections are logged, and our response is posted alongside them.
Dispute or add context →