2513 Seton Ave, Austin TX 78705 · aliases: Rambler, Rambler West Campus
Verified · 5 sources Data vintage 2026-08-10
Code complaints the City of Austin has logged for this address. We match them to the county parcel ID (0214010413), the county's record for this plot of land. The number counts filings; a rating is separate.
Last 36 mo: 14 distinct · 7 duplicate · 1 open
Source: Austin 6wtj-zbtb · captured 2026-08-10
Published only when the scoring rule is public. Same rule, same day, every building. Read the rule →
What it costs
20 archived captures of the operator's own listing page, Dec 22–May 26.
Source: www.rambleratx.com/floorplans/ · the operator's own published listing page · archived via the Wayback Machine · 20 captures, Dec 22–May 26
WCII analysis Across 20 archived captures of Rambler ATX's listing page, the median advertised rent sits between $1,259 and $1,629, and the most recent capture (May 26) reads $1,384. We do not draw a trend through these points, and we do not subtract the first from the last. Student housing sells the lease year as a filter. An operator can advertise next year's lease and this year's leftover rooms on the same day, and these archived pages never record which one a price was for. So two captures months apart may be quoting different lease years, and the gap between them is not a rent change we can source. Each dot supports one fact, with a receipt: on that date, this page advertised that rent.
| Captured | Median | Range · verified | Plans | Confidence | Receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2026 | $1,384 | - | 10 | scanned | archiveMay 26 |
| April 19, 2026 | $1,399 | - | 12 | scanned | archiveApr 26 |
| April 12, 2026 | $1,409 | - | 13 | scanned | archiveApr 26 |
| January 16, 2026 | $1,549 | - | 19 | scanned | archiveJan 26 |
| October 10, 2025 | $1,589 | - | 25 | scanned | archiveOct 25 |
| August 6, 2025 | $1,389 | - | 8 | scanned | archiveAug 25 |
| April 26, 2025 | $1,369 | - | 15 | scanned | archiveApr 25 |
| January 21, 2025 | $1,519 | - | 21 | scanned | archiveJan 25 |
| November 7, 2024 | $1,409 | - | 24 | scanned | archiveNov 24 |
| October 7, 2024 | $1,599 | - | 25 | scanned | archiveOct 24 |
| August 11, 2024 | $1,509 | - | 12 | scanned | archiveAug 24 |
| July 24, 2024 | $1,259 | - | 12 | scanned | archiveJul 24 |
| April 21, 2024 | $1,509 | - | 16 | scanned | archiveApr 24 |
| January 16, 2024 | $1,479 | - | 20 | scanned | archiveJan 24 |
| October 31, 2023 | $1,519 | - | 19 | scanned | archiveOct 23 |
| October 3, 2023 | $1,629 | - | 25 | scanned | archiveOct 23 |
| September 30, 2023 | $1,589 | - | 25 | scanned | archiveSep 23 |
| March 24, 2023 | $1,432 | - | 4 | scanned | archiveMar 23 |
| March 20, 2023 | $1,432 | - | 4 | scanned | archiveMar 23 |
| December 6, 2022 | $1,349 | - | 11 | scanned | archiveDec 22 |
Every row links to its receipt, the exact Wayback snapshot the figure was read from, with the rents visible on the archived page. The prices are reproduced public record; the median and the trend read are WCII analysis over those facts. Range is shown only for the machine-verified captures, where the min and max are trustworthy.
The lived record
Reviewers who toured average 4.9★; residents who lived here average 3.9★.
Source: manual capture of public Google reviews · Rambler ATX
WCII analysis Manual, sampled capture of the building's public Google reviews (guardrail 5, no scraper), each sorted by whether the writer had toured or actually lived here. This is not an input to any conditions grade, because star ratings are solicitable (guardrail 6). Individual staff names are withheld (guardrail 4).
tour review, 5★ on Google Maps →Had a great time at Rambler Apartments! A special shoutout to on the leasing team, she was very thorough and answered any and all questions we had about the complex and what it was like to live there. We truly enjoyed our tour and loved getting real feedback from current residents!
resident review, 1★ on Google Maps →I’d heard multiple complaints about maintenance and their slow and sloppy efforts and they’ve definitely lived up to the claims. and I filed a work order and maintenance was lazy enough to not even pop by our apartment but marked the maintenance order as ‘complete’
resident review, 1★ on Google Maps →Our apartments AC has been broken since move in and the rambler has done nothing but ignore our complaints. With summer approaching I’m mortified for my living situation. (I’m also paying over 1500 for no working AC)
21 cases on the city's file · 14 distinct in the last 36 months.
Source: Austin 6wtj-zbtb · captured 2026-08-10 · parcel 0214010413
Austin files each complaint under a category and records how it ended, the outcome. “No violation found,” “closed via voluntary compliance” (a problem the city got fixed), and “duplicate case” are different stories, and the outcome sits under each status. Where a complaint became a formal violation case, that row links to the city's full case file.
21 filed · 7 duplicate · 10 no violation found · 2 violation found or resolved after city contact · 1 still open · 1 referred or administrative
Austin's own disposition labels, counted. This is not a WCII judgement and not a finding of wrongdoing. Records outside the 36-month window are in the ledger below but not in these counts.
| Opened | Case ID | Type | Status & outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| July 21, 2026 | 2026-094296 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Active Inspection Performed |
| February 27, 2026 | 2026-024108 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed March 2, 2026 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| January 16, 2026 | 2026-006145 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed January 21, 2026 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| December 1, 2025 | 2025-152514 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed January 20, 2026 Closed/Duplicate Case |
| July 30, 2024 | 2024-095749 CC | Property Abatement | Closed July 31, 2024 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| July 3, 2024 | 2024-083047 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed July 31, 2024 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| June 24, 2024 | 2024-078569 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed June 26, 2024 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| June 17, 2024 | 2024-075802 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed June 24, 2024 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| June 6, 2024 | 2024-071481 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed June 10, 2024 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| February 26, 2024 | 2024-023516 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed March 8, 2024 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| January 23, 2024 | 2024-008546 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed January 24, 2024 Closed/Duplicate Case |
| January 23, 2024 | 2024-008563 CC City case file2024 008926-CV | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed January 31, 2024 Closed due to Voluntary Compliance |
| Opened | Case ID | Type | Status & outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| January 23, 2024 | 2024-008506 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed January 24, 2024 Closed/Duplicate Case |
| January 23, 2024 | 2024-008564 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed January 24, 2024 Closed/Duplicate Case |
| November 9, 2023 | 2023-146155 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed November 13, 2023 Closed/Duplicate Case |
| November 9, 2023 | 2023-146126 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed November 13, 2023 Closed/Duplicate Case |
| November 2, 2023 | 2023-142001 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed November 3, 2023 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| October 30, 2023 | 2023-140571 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed October 31, 2023 Inspection Performed |
| October 12, 2023 | 2023-133057 CC City case file2023 133204-CV | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed November 17, 2023 Closed due to Voluntary Compliance |
| October 12, 2023 | 2023-133058 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed October 13, 2023 Closed/Duplicate Case |
| September 15, 2023 | 2023-120422 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed September 19, 2023 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
These are Austin's own records. To read a specific one, search its case ID in the City's public code-complaint table →
Before you sign
What the receipted series supports about when to apply, and what it does not.
Source: this page's own receipted series (asking rents · deals timeline · offers ledger · city complaint records) folded together · computed build-apply-timing.mjs
2026-07-23: “Sandstone 4x2: Get $1,000 or Interior Design Package (worth $1,000)!”
Verbatim from the operator's own site, observed by WCII's offer ledger (checked several times a day, because these offers rotate, sometimes within a day).
WCII analysis Across 20 captures in 5 years, month-by-month medians are computable but capture-sparse; treat as directional only. 21 code-complaint records in the trailing 36 months. 7 of those the city marked as duplicating another case, leaving 14 distinct incidents. Duplicates measure how many households a problem reached, not how many problems there were. No month runs hot enough, or often enough across years, to call it a season. A quiet-month tour is the building at its best; do not price it as typical.
Advertised 'starting at' rents are per-bed minimums; the bed you are offered may cost more. A discount comes on top of the rent, it does not replace it. A gift card is a one-time saving; a monthly discount repeats each month. Coverage is capture-limited: months with no snapshot are unknowns, not evidence of no change (asymmetric-evidence rule).
Owner of record, the legal entity behind it, and the operator, LV Collective.
Source: TCAD 2026 preliminary roll · TX Comptroller · captured per receipts
Corroborated · 2+ datasets
The name on the marketing isn't always the name on the deed. Here is the chain as public records file it: the owner of record, the legal entity behind it, and the operator who runs the building. That is who you'd actually be renting from.
5 primary sources. Every fact on this page traces to one of them.
Every fact on this page traces to a primary source below. This is the "back every claim with a receipt" rule made literal. The building would not appear on the site without it.
Every verified building and operator on this site is checked against the same public datasets, by the same rule, on the same schedule.
Corrections are logged, and our response is posted alongside them.
Dispute or add context →