2518 Leon St, Austin TX 78705 · aliases: The Nine
Verified · 5 sources Data vintage 2026-09-14
Code complaints the City of Austin has logged for this address. We match them to the county parcel ID (0214000525), the county's record for this plot of land. The number counts filings; a rating is separate.
Last 36 mo: 4 distinct
Source: Austin 6wtj-zbtb · captured 2026-09-14
Manual, sampled capture, no scraper.
Published only when the scoring rule is public. Same rule, same day, every building. Read the rule →
What it costs
35 archived captures of the operator's own listing page, Aug 20–Apr 26.
Source: theninewestcampus.com/floorplans/ · the operator's own published listing page · archived via the Wayback Machine · 35 captures, Aug 20–Apr 26
WCII analysis Across 35 archived captures of The Nine at West Campus's listing page, the median advertised rent sits between $1,000 and $1,250, and the most recent capture (Apr 26) reads $1,247. We do not draw a trend through these points, and we do not subtract the first from the last. Student housing sells the lease year as a filter. An operator can advertise next year's lease and this year's leftover rooms on the same day, and these archived pages never record which one a price was for. So two captures months apart may be quoting different lease years, and the gap between them is not a rent change we can source. Each dot supports one fact, with a receipt: on that date, this page advertised that rent.
| Captured | Median | Range · verified | Plans | Confidence | Receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 14, 2026 | $1,247 | - | 15 | scanned | archiveApr 26 |
| March 16, 2026 | $1,222 | - | 14 | scanned | archiveMar 26 |
| February 9, 2026 | $1,250 | - | 2 | scanned | archiveFeb 26 |
| January 15, 2026 | $1,250 | - | 2 | scanned | archiveJan 26 |
| December 4, 2025 | $1,250 | - | 2 | scanned | archiveDec 25 |
| November 15, 2025 | $1,000 | - | 3 | scanned | archiveNov 25 |
| October 4, 2025 | $1,000 | - | 3 | scanned | archiveOct 25 |
| August 13, 2025 | $1,250 | - | 2 | scanned | archiveAug 25 |
| July 15, 2025 | $1,250 | - | 2 | scanned | archiveJul 25 |
| May 19, 2025 | $1,250 | - | 2 | scanned | archiveMay 25 |
| April 16, 2025 | $1,250 | - | 2 | scanned | archiveApr 25 |
| March 23, 2025 | $1,250 | - | 2 | scanned | archiveMar 25 |
| February 7, 2025 | $1,250 | - | 2 | scanned | archiveFeb 25 |
| December 11, 2024 | $1,250 | - | 2 | scanned | archiveDec 24 |
| May 27, 2024 | $1,250 | - | 2 | scanned | archiveMay 24 |
| February 20, 2024 | $1,010 | - | 3 | scanned | archiveFeb 24 |
| December 8, 2023 | $1,250 | - | 2 | scanned | archiveDec 23 |
| May 31, 2023 | $1,173 | - | 12 | scanned | archiveJun 23 |
| March 20, 2023 | $1,170 | - | 15 | scanned | archiveMar 23 |
| February 19, 2023 | $1,180 | - | 16 | scanned | archiveFeb 23 |
| February 4, 2023 | $1,185 | - | 17 | scanned | archiveFeb 23 |
| December 4, 2022 | $1,080 | - | 6 | scanned | archiveDec 22 |
| September 29, 2022 | $1,130 | - | 5 | scanned | archiveSep 22 |
| May 17, 2022 | $1,160 | - | 4 | scanned | archiveMay 22 |
| January 26, 2022 | $1,055 | - | 12 | scanned | archiveJan 22 |
| January 14, 2022 | $1,145 | - | 9 | scanned | archiveJan 22 |
| December 1, 2021 | $1,118 | - | 12 | scanned | archiveDec 21 |
| October 26, 2021 | $1,150 | - | 8 | scanned | archiveOct 21 |
| September 27, 2021 | $1,160 | - | 8 | scanned | archiveSep 21 |
| July 28, 2021 | $1,208 | - | 8 | scanned | archiveJul 21 |
| June 11, 2021 | $1,208 | - | 8 | scanned | archiveJun 21 |
| May 11, 2021 | $1,110 | - | 11 | scanned | archiveMay 21 |
| April 15, 2021 | $1,060 | - | 15 | scanned | archiveApr 21 |
| February 28, 2021 | $1,118 | - | 14 | scanned | archiveMar 21 |
| August 12, 2020 | $1,079 | - | 10 | scanned | archiveAug 20 |
Every row links to its receipt, the exact Wayback snapshot the figure was read from, with the rents visible on the archived page. The prices are reproduced public record; the median and the trend read are WCII analysis over those facts. Range is shown only for the machine-verified captures, where the min and max are trustworthy.
The lived record
Not yet captured. Review acquisition is manual and sampled.
The lived-experience-only rating (raw Google rating recomputed against tour/staff-praise and pre-opening reviews) is a planned layer. Review acquisition is manual and sampled, and no scraper is built by default (guardrail 5). Nothing is shown here until real data is collected.
4 cases on the city's file · 4 distinct in the last 36 months.
Source: Austin 6wtj-zbtb · captured 2026-09-14 · parcel 0214000525
Austin files each complaint under a category and records how it ended, the outcome. “No violation found,” “closed via voluntary compliance” (a problem the city got fixed), and “duplicate case” are different stories, and the outcome sits under each status. Where a complaint became a formal violation case, that row links to the city's full case file.
Minimal adverse record
4 code complaints were filed with the city on this parcel in the last 36 months. That number sets the label above, under a rule that applies to every building the same way. Each case is listed below and links to the city's own record.
WCII analysis, not a finding of wrongdoing. The count is not adjusted for the number of beds yet, so a large tower and a small building sit on the same scale. How this label is decided.
4 filed · 4 no violation found
Austin's own disposition labels, counted. This is not a WCII judgement and not a finding of wrongdoing. Records outside the 36-month window are in the ledger below but not in these counts.
| Opened | Case ID | Type | Status & outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| September 1, 2025 | 2025-110677 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed October 16, 2025 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| March 30, 2025 | 2025-037773 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed April 11, 2025 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| October 24, 2024 | 2024-143456 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed October 30, 2024 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| June 27, 2024 | 2024-080984 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed June 28, 2024 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
These are Austin's own records. To read a specific one, search its case ID in the City's public code-complaint table →
Before you sign
What the receipted series supports about when to apply, and what it does not.
Source: this page's own receipted series (asking rents · deals timeline · offers ledger · city complaint records) folded together · computed build-apply-timing.mjs
2026-08-18: “Waived app/admin fees on the last 10 spaces remaining! Last Chance to Lease! Call Now to Find Home!”
Verbatim from the operator's own site, observed by WCII's offer ledger (checked several times a day, because these offers rotate, sometimes within a day).
WCII analysis Across 35 captures in 7 years, month-by-month medians are computable but capture-sparse; treat as directional only. 4 code-complaint records in the trailing 36 months. Too few records to look for a monthly pattern at all. A quiet-month tour is the building at its best; do not price it as typical.
Advertised 'starting at' rents are per-bed minimums; the bed you are offered may cost more. A discount comes on top of the rent, it does not replace it. A gift card is a one-time saving; a monthly discount repeats each month. Coverage is capture-limited: months with no snapshot are unknowns, not evidence of no change (asymmetric-evidence rule).
Owner of record, the legal entity behind it, and the operator, Landmark Properties.
Source: TCAD 2026 preliminary roll · TX Comptroller · captured per receipts
Corroborated · 2+ datasets
The name on the marketing isn't always the name on the deed. Here is the chain as public records file it: the owner of record, the legal entity behind it, and the operator who runs the building. That is who you'd actually be renting from.
5 primary sources. Every fact on this page traces to one of them.
Every fact on this page traces to a primary source below. This is the "back every claim with a receipt" rule made literal. The building would not appear on the site without it.
Every verified building and operator on this site is checked against the same public datasets, by the same rule, on the same schedule.
Corrections are logged, and our response is posted alongside them.
Dispute or add context →