2100 Rio Grande St, Austin TX 78705 · aliases: The 9 at Rio, The Nine at Rio Grande, 9 at Rio
Verified · 4 sources Data vintage 2026-08-10
Code complaints the City of Austin has logged for this address. We match them to the county parcel ID (0212010905), the county's record for this plot of land. The number counts filings; a rating is separate.
Last 36 mo: 7 distinct
Source: Austin 6wtj-zbtb · captured 2026-08-10
WCII analysis Pricing is JavaScript-rendered or call-for-pricing, so the weekly static-HTML archive finds no dollar figures.
Published only when the scoring rule is public. Same rule, same day, every building. Read the rule →
The lived record
Reviewers who toured average 4.8★; residents who lived here average 3.6★.
Source: manual capture of public Google reviews · The Nine at Rio
WCII analysis Manual, sampled capture of the building's public Google reviews (guardrail 5, no scraper), each sorted by whether the writer had toured or actually lived here. This is not an input to any conditions grade, because star ratings are solicitable (guardrail 6). Individual staff names are withheld (guardrail 4).
tour review, 5★ on Google Maps →Great customer service from the whole team. I spoke to and she was able to show me their available rooms and answer all my questions.
resident review, 1★ on Google Maps →homeless people defecate and urinate in the stairwells and security is nonexistent in the property. they also leave the main door unlocked so the gym is full of people who don’t live in the apartment everyday
resident review, 1★ on Google Maps →Management will not help you with anything that inconvenience them. Including putting a door handle on the front door of the front entrance of the building. Looking for a nice balcony? Don’t come here they switch the locks and lock you in. Want to complain on their Instagram? Don’t bother they…
7 cases on the city's file · 7 distinct in the last 36 months.
Source: Austin 6wtj-zbtb · captured 2026-08-10 · parcel 0212010905
Austin files each complaint under a category and records how it ended, the outcome. “No violation found,” “closed via voluntary compliance” (a problem the city got fixed), and “duplicate case” are different stories, and the outcome sits under each status. Where a complaint became a formal violation case, that row links to the city's full case file.
7 filed · 6 no violation found · 1 violation found or resolved after city contact
Austin's own disposition labels, counted. This is not a WCII judgement and not a finding of wrongdoing. Records outside the 36-month window are in the ledger below but not in these counts.
| Opened | Case ID | Type | Status & outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| July 6, 2026 | 2026-086486 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed July 16, 2026 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| February 5, 2026 | 2026-014116 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed March 11, 2026 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| September 2, 2025 | 2025-111362 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed September 3, 2025 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| August 23, 2024 | 2024-107937 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed August 27, 2024 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| July 3, 2024 | 2024-083357 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed July 11, 2024 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| May 31, 2024 | 2024-068908 CC City case file2024 090924-CV | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed August 12, 2024 Closed due to Voluntary Compliance |
| May 16, 2024 | 2024-062344 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed May 17, 2024 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
These are Austin's own records. To read a specific one, search its case ID in the City's public code-complaint table →
Before you sign
Owner of record, the legal entity behind it, and the operator, Landmark Properties.
Source: TCAD 2026 preliminary roll · TX Comptroller · captured per receipts
Corroborated · 2+ datasets
The name on the marketing isn't always the name on the deed. Here is the chain as public records file it: the owner of record, the legal entity behind it, and the operator who runs the building. That is who you'd actually be renting from.
4 primary sources. Every fact on this page traces to one of them.
Every fact on this page traces to a primary source below. This is the "back every claim with a receipt" rule made literal. The building would not appear on the site without it.
Every verified building and operator on this site is checked against the same public datasets, by the same rule, on the same schedule.
Corrections are logged, and our response is posted alongside them.
Dispute or add context →