2502 Nueces St, Austin TX 78705 · aliases: The Ruckus, Ruckus, Yugo Nueces
Verified · 4 sources Data vintage 2026-09-14
Code complaints the City of Austin has logged for this address. We match them to the county parcel ID (0214010407), the county's record for this plot of land. The number counts filings; a rating is separate.
Last 36 mo: 4 distinct · 1 duplicate
Source: Austin 6wtj-zbtb · captured 2026-09-14
Manual, sampled capture, no scraper.
WCII analysis The floor-plans page renders pricing via JavaScript or as "call for pricing," so the weekly static-HTML archive finds no dollar figures.
Published only when the scoring rule is public. Same rule, same day, every building. Read the rule →
The lived record
Not yet captured. Review acquisition is manual and sampled.
The lived-experience-only rating (raw Google rating recomputed against tour/staff-praise and pre-opening reviews) is a planned layer. Review acquisition is manual and sampled, and no scraper is built by default (guardrail 5). Nothing is shown here until real data is collected.
5 cases on the city's file · 4 distinct in the last 36 months.
Source: Austin 6wtj-zbtb · captured 2026-09-14 · parcel 0214010407
Austin files each complaint under a category and records how it ended, the outcome. “No violation found,” “closed via voluntary compliance” (a problem the city got fixed), and “duplicate case” are different stories, and the outcome sits under each status. Where a complaint became a formal violation case, that row links to the city's full case file.
Minimal adverse record
4 code complaints were filed with the city on this parcel in the last 36 months. The city closed 1 of them as duplicates, and a duplicate counts as half a filing, which gives 3.5. That number sets the label above, under a rule that applies to every building the same way. Each case is listed below and links to the city's own record.
WCII analysis, not a finding of wrongdoing. The count is not adjusted for the number of beds yet, so a large tower and a small building sit on the same scale. How this label is decided.
5 filed · 1 duplicate · 4 no violation found
Austin's own disposition labels, counted. This is not a WCII judgement and not a finding of wrongdoing. Records outside the 36-month window are in the ledger below but not in these counts.
| Opened | Case ID | Type | Status & outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| August 24, 2026 | 2026-110568 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed September 4, 2026 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| March 6, 2025 | 2025-027253 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed March 11, 2025 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| November 13, 2024 | 2024-151363 CC | Land Use Violation(S) | Closed November 14, 2024 Closed/Duplicate Case |
| November 12, 2024 | 2024-150453 CC | Land Use Violation(S) | Closed November 14, 2024 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| March 26, 2024 | 2024-037983 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed April 2, 2024 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
These are Austin's own records. To read a specific one, search its case ID in the City's public code-complaint table →
Before you sign
Owner of record, the legal entity behind it, and the operator, Yugo (USA) LLC.
Source: TCAD 2026 preliminary roll · TX Comptroller · captured per receipts
Corroborated · 2+ datasets
The name on the marketing isn't always the name on the deed. Here is the chain as public records file it: the owner of record, the legal entity behind it, and the operator who runs the building. That is who you'd actually be renting from.
4 primary sources. Every fact on this page traces to one of them.
Every fact on this page traces to a primary source below. This is the "back every claim with a receipt" rule made literal. The building would not appear on the site without it.
Every verified building and operator on this site is checked against the same public datasets, by the same rule, on the same schedule.
Corrections are logged, and our response is posted alongside them.
Dispute or add context →