2111 Rio Grande St, Austin TX 78705 · aliases: Villas Rio Grande
Verified · 5 sources Data vintage 2026-09-14
Code complaints the City of Austin has logged for this address. We match them to the county parcel ID (0212011010), the county's record for this plot of land. The number counts filings; a rating is separate.
Last 36 mo: 3 distinct · 1 duplicate
Source: Austin 6wtj-zbtb · captured 2026-09-14
Manual, sampled capture, no scraper.
Published only when the scoring rule is public. Same rule, same day, every building. Read the rule →
What it costs
17 archived captures of the operator's own listing page, May 22–May 26.
Source: villasonrio.com/floor-plans/ · the operator's own published listing page · archived via the Wayback Machine · 17 captures, May 22–May 26
WCII analysis Across 17 archived captures of Villas on Rio's listing page, the median advertised rent sits between $1,284 and $1,549, and the most recent capture (May 26) reads $1,524. We do not draw a trend through these points, and we do not subtract the first from the last. Student housing sells the lease year as a filter. An operator can advertise next year's lease and this year's leftover rooms on the same day, and these archived pages never record which one a price was for. So two captures months apart may be quoting different lease years, and the gap between them is not a rent change we can source. Each dot supports one fact, with a receipt: on that date, this page advertised that rent.
| Captured | Median | Range · verified | Plans | Confidence | Receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | $1,524 | $989–$1,789 | 16 | verified | archiveMay 26 |
| March 6, 2026 | $1,549 | $989–$1,949 | 33 | verified | archiveMar 26 |
| November 15, 2025 | $1,529 | $690–$1,949 | 31 | verified | archiveNov 25 |
| July 11, 2025 | $1,514 | $959–$1,919 | 24 | verified | archiveJul 25 |
| March 17, 2025 | $1,504 | $949–$1,919 | 26 | verified | archiveMar 25 |
| February 13, 2025 | $1,499 | $949–$1,919 | 26 | verified | archiveFeb 25 |
| February 11, 2025 | $1,499 | $949–$1,919 | 26 | verified | archiveFeb 25 |
| November 13, 2024 | $1,499 | $949–$1,919 | 26 | verified | archiveNov 24 |
| August 9, 2024 | $1,459 | - | 23 | scanned | archiveAug 24 |
| March 1, 2024 | $1,419 | - | 25 | scanned | archiveMar 24 |
| December 10, 2023 | $1,409 | - | 25 | scanned | archiveDec 23 |
| June 3, 2023 | $1,379 | - | 25 | scanned | archiveJun 23 |
| March 20, 2023 | $1,369 | - | 25 | scanned | archiveMar 23 |
| March 4, 2023 | $1,369 | - | 25 | scanned | archiveMar 23 |
| November 29, 2022 | $1,379 | - | 25 | scanned | archiveNov 22 |
| October 1, 2022 | $1,379 | - | 25 | scanned | archiveOct 22 |
| May 26, 2022 | $1,284 | - | 25 | scanned | archiveMay 22 |
Every row links to its receipt, the exact Wayback snapshot the figure was read from, with the rents visible on the archived page. The prices are reproduced public record; the median and the trend read are WCII analysis over those facts. Range is shown only for the machine-verified captures, where the min and max are trustworthy.
The lived record
Not yet captured. Review acquisition is manual and sampled.
The lived-experience-only rating (raw Google rating recomputed against tour/staff-praise and pre-opening reviews) is a planned layer. Review acquisition is manual and sampled, and no scraper is built by default (guardrail 5). Nothing is shown here until real data is collected.
4 cases on the city's file · 3 distinct in the last 36 months.
Source: Austin 6wtj-zbtb · captured 2026-09-14 · parcel 0212011010
Austin files each complaint under a category and records how it ended, the outcome. “No violation found,” “closed via voluntary compliance” (a problem the city got fixed), and “duplicate case” are different stories, and the outcome sits under each status. Where a complaint became a formal violation case, that row links to the city's full case file.
Minimal adverse record
5 code complaints were filed with the city on this parcel in the last 36 months. The city closed 1 of them as duplicates, and a duplicate counts as half a filing, which gives 4.5. That number sets the label above, under a rule that applies to every building the same way. Each case is listed below and links to the city's own record.
WCII analysis, not a finding of wrongdoing. The count is not adjusted for the number of beds yet, so a large tower and a small building sit on the same scale. How this label is decided.
4 filed · 1 duplicate · 1 no violation found · 2 violation found or resolved after city contact
Austin's own disposition labels, counted. This is not a WCII judgement and not a finding of wrongdoing. Records outside the 36-month window are in the ledger below but not in these counts.
| Opened | Case ID | Type | Status & outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2024 | 2024-054178 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed May 6, 2024 No Violation(s) Found/Inspection Performed |
| March 20, 2024 | 2024-035201 CC | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed March 21, 2024 Closed/Duplicate Case |
| March 9, 2024 | 2024-029921 CC City case file2024 031034-CV | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed August 9, 2024 Closed due to Voluntary Compliance |
| October 26, 2023 | 2023-139339 CC City case file2023 139481-CV | Structure Condition Violation(S) | Closed November 8, 2023 Closed due to Voluntary Compliance |
These are Austin's own records. To read a specific one, search its case ID in the City's public code-complaint table →
Before you sign
What the receipted series supports about when to apply, and what it does not.
Source: this page's own receipted series (asking rents · deals timeline · offers ledger · city complaint records) folded together · computed build-apply-timing.mjs
2026-08-18: “Limited Time Offer! Lock in your $939 rate before it's gone!”
Verbatim from the operator's own site, observed by WCII's offer ledger (checked several times a day, because these offers rotate, sometimes within a day).
WCII analysis Across 17 captures in 5 years, month-by-month medians are computable but capture-sparse; treat as directional only. 5 code-complaint records in the trailing 36 months. 1 of those the city marked as duplicating another case, leaving 4 distinct incidents. Duplicates measure how many households a problem reached, not how many problems there were. Too few records to look for a monthly pattern at all. A quiet-month tour is the building at its best; do not price it as typical.
Advertised 'starting at' rents are per-bed minimums; the bed you are offered may cost more. A discount comes on top of the rent, it does not replace it. A gift card is a one-time saving; a monthly discount repeats each month. Coverage is capture-limited: months with no snapshot are unknowns, not evidence of no change (asymmetric-evidence rule).
Owner of record, the legal entity behind it, and the operator, PeakMade Real Estate.
Source: TCAD 2026 preliminary roll · TX Comptroller · captured per receipts
Corroborated · 2+ datasets
The name on the marketing isn't always the name on the deed. Here is the chain as public records file it: the owner of record, the legal entity behind it, and the operator who runs the building. That is who you'd actually be renting from.
5 primary sources. Every fact on this page traces to one of them.
Every fact on this page traces to a primary source below. This is the "back every claim with a receipt" rule made literal. The building would not appear on the site without it.
Every verified building and operator on this site is checked against the same public datasets, by the same rule, on the same schedule.
Corrections are logged, and our response is posted alongside them.
Dispute or add context →